Spiritual Authority and Temporal
Power
By René
Guénon
Pub Date: 08/01
Publisher: Sophia Perennis
Binding: Paper, 108pp.
ISBN: 0900588462
Our Price 10% off $18.95
Related Books: Comparative
Religion
Related Audio/Video: Martin Lings, Frithjof
Schuon and Rene Guenon
Deals with the normal relationship between the spiritual and the temporal powers implied in a healthy traditional
civilization; that is, the supremacy of knowledge over action, of the sacerdotal over the royal caste. Touching first on India and the medieval West, Guénon then illustrates his point by citing quarrels over investiture and disputes of certain French kingswith the papacy as evidence of a deviation in Christianity.
This
century has been witness to both widespread global destruction of
traditional institutions of temporal power and the questioning of the
very anti-traditional ideas and ideologies which have brought about that
destruction. At such a moment when so many seek to understand what the
foundations of political power and the principles for the structuring of
society should be, the classical work of René Guénon remains an
invaluable source of guidance. Based on traditional principles expounded
with the lucidity and clarity that characterizes Guénon’s other
writings, this work makes clear the significance of temporal authority,
the source of its legitimacy, and its role in a society structured on
the basis of principls which the contemporary world neglects at its own
peril. Dealing with doctrines which transcend time, Guénon’s work is
as timely today as when it was written. Its first translation into
English presented here cannot but be welcomed by all interested in
traditional doctrines, and more particularly in the application of these
doctrines to the social order.
—Seyyed
Hossein Nasr.
In
a sense the present work complements Guénon’s East and West, The
Crisis of the Modern World, and The Reign of Quantity and the
Signs of the Times, for whereas the latter detail the West’s
gradual movement away from its tradition, Spiritual Authority and
Temporal Power focuses by contrast on what Guénon believed to be
the normal relationship between the spiritual and the temporal implied
in a healthy traditional civilization, that is, the supremacy of
knowledge over action, of the sacerdotal over the royal caste. Touching
first on India and the medieval West, Guénon then illustrates his point
by citing quarrels over investiture and disputes of certain French kings
with the papacy as evidence of a deviation in Christianity. In his
preface Guénon refers to recent ‘incidents’ that had drawn
attention to this general question, and although he says that his
deliberations are not meant to deal directly with them, it may be of
interest to note that the events concerned centered on a confrontation
in 1926 between the political organization Action Française and Pope
Pius XI.
From
Chacornac’s Simple Life of René Guénon
There
seems no doubt that some degree of sympathy existed at the time between
Guénon and certain leaders of Action Française. We say ‘some
degree’ because it is clear that Daudet, of all the leaders of Action
Française, was the most capable of understanding Guénon, and of
accepting, at least partially, his point of view. It is no less evident
that there must have been far less sympathy between Guénon and Charles
Maurras, for certain circumstances, upon which we cannot enlarge here,
were soon to reveal just how far apart Maurras’ and Guénon’s ideas
were on traditional society.
In
his consistorial address of December 20, 1926, entitled Misericordia
Domini, Pope Pius XI condemned the political movement Action Française
as ‘a danger to the integrity of faith and morals as well as to the
Catholic education of youth.’ On December 26 Action Française
took the side of resistance against the authority of the Church,
publishing its famous Non possumus. A decree of the Holy Office
on December 29 then proscribed the journal and placed it on the Index.
This condemnation, and the insubordination of Action Française,
were to disturb Catholic circles for some years both in and out of
France to such a point that a member of the Sacred College, Cardinal
Billot, relinquished his red hat. Guénon was not in the least occupied
with politics but could not avoid hearing of this affair, which seemed
to him a characteristic illustration of his contemporaries’ lack of
understanding, however ‘traditionalist’ they proclaimed themselves
to be, of the normal relationship between religion and politics. This
served as the occasion for him to define the traditional position on
this point and to set it in a wider context by broadening its scope,
which he did in his Spiritual Authority and Temporal Power,
published in 1929 by Vrin. Asserting that here as elsewhere it is
principles he constantly has in view, the author nevertheless
acknowledges in his preface that the considerations to be developed in
this study have an added interest at the present time due to recent
discussions about the relationship between religion and politics—a
question that is only one particular form, under certain determinate
conditions, of the relationship between the spiritual and the temporal.
But it would be a mistake to believe that these considerations have been
inspired by the incidents we have alluded to, or that we intend to deal
with them directly, for this would amount to according an exaggerated
importance to purely episodic matters that could never influence
conceptions that are in reality of a completely diVerent order in their
nature and origin.
From
the traditional point of view, the relationship between the spiritual
and the temporal refers principally to that between knowledge and
action, action being—in a normal civilization—hierarchically
subordinate to knowledge. This is expressed concretely in the
predominance of the priestly over the royal caste in civilizations such
as those of India or of medieval Christianity, for the crowning of
emperors and kings by the spiritual authority is, at least in principle,
a submission of the temporal power to the authority of the priesthood.
This situation is reversed when royalty aspires to supremacy, or even
lays claim to independence. The author mentions examples from India and
Christianity, citing particularly quarrels over investiture and disputes
of certain kings of France, notably Philip the Fair, with the papacy. In
a certain way one must say that Spiritual Authority and Temporal Power
forms the indispensable complement to East and West and The
Crisis of the Modern World, since a return by the West to its
tradition implies an awareness of the normal relationship between the
spiritual and the temporal, for as long as a regularly constituted
spiritual authority continues to subsist, even though it be
unacknowledged by almost all (including its own representatives) and
reduced to no more than a shadow of itself, this authority will always
prove the better part, and this can never be taken away from it because
it contains something higher than the possibilities that are purely
human; even weakened or dormant, this part still incarnates ‘the one
thing needful’, the only thing that does not pass away.